Criminology Report- The August 2011 Public Disorder-an analysis of the Essay

Criminology Report- The August 2011 Public Disorder-an abstract of the info on those bright before the courts - Essay ExampleThe data presented in the filing fails to reign over authenticity and as the bulletin reports, the use of it should be under the understanding of its potential flows and is only viewed as approximations. The most observable features of the data as presented is the rounded off figures which therefore confirms the approximate nature of the data. The data presented covers factual records on court hearing data, data on ethnicity as well as suppurate and gender and data on case classifications on area among others. Moreover, the distribution of the court proceedings betwixt the court systems across the country is in record within the data presented. Nevertheless, it would be pointed bulge that the data presented fails to authoritatively quantify the number of offenders involved in each act of offence as was move during the time. It is however acknowledged th at the data presented was collected/retrieved from the administrative records as official statistics. This implies that though with the possible shortcomings pointed out in the discussion, the data can be used for research purposes as secondary data by the virtue of being official statistics.The report shows that the public violence involved many people who had disparities in age, gender and motives (Dodd, 2011). The report notes that on the basis of age, the public disorder involved 27% juveniles (aged between 10 and 17 years), 26% were aged 18-18 years while only an approximate of 5% of the offenders were above 40 years by age. In comparison with the age distribution of offenders previously convicted in similar offences in 2010, great disparities were observed from the 2011 statistics, majorly being on the numbers of offenders. Amongst 3103 defendants who faced initial trials in London magistrate courts, 27% were juveniles while the remaining 73% were adults. It is however to be n oted that this was only 72% of the total incriminate persons because others